Please Cancel Opposition to Electronic Cigarettes
To: Senator Lautenberg
Fax: 202 228 4054
Subject: Please Cancel Opposition to Electronic Cigarettes
Honorable Senator Lautenberg:
In my capacity as Chair of the Tobacco Control Task Force of the American Association of Public Health Physicians, I must vigorously oppose your proposal that FDA ban electronic cigarettes.
Among the many manufacturers and vendors of electronic cigarettes there appear to be some that make unjustified claims of health benefits. While it would be appropriate for FDA to address those manufacturers and vendors relative to their specific claims, banning all electronic cigarettes would not benefit the public.
Conventional cigarettes kill about 400,000 adult American Smokers each year from cigarette-related illness. Over the next 20 years this will total 8 million deaths among current adult smokers, most of which are now over 35 years of age. Cigarettes kill about 30% of consistent adult cigarette smokers.
Smoking cessation rates among these smokers are abysmal -about 3% per year. Pharmaceutical products with counseling, quit lines, etc, are little better - resulting in quit rates no greater than 5% (as measured at 12 months post-intervention) among those willing to try these modalities. In other words, current approaches fail 95% of smokers using them.
Adult American smokers are health conscious, as evidenced by the fact that about 85% of them have switched to light and low-tar cigarettes, believing (incorrectly) that they pose less health risk.
Research to date has clearly demonstrated that smokers smoke because they are addicted to nicotine. This same research also shows that the illness and death due to cigarettes is not due to the nicotine, but due to products of combustion and, to a lesser degree, toxins in the cigarette tobacco.
Alternative nicotine delivery devices, including, but not limited to electronic cigarettes, have no products of combustion and none of the toxins in cigarette tobacco. On at least a theoretical basis, they could and should be seen as generic equivalents of the pharmaceutical nicotine products. As best we can tell, on the basis of currently available research data, these products promise a risk of illness and death well under 1% of the risk posed by cigarettes.
Both houses of Congress now seem poised to pass an FDA/Tobacco bill (H.R.1256 in the House). This bill, if passed in its current form will provide, at least on an interim basis, the FDA seal of approval on currently marketed cigarettes. That being the case, the safety standard that should be used for other tobacco products, and for alternative non-pharmaceutical nicotine delivery devices, should the hazard posed by cigarettes, not a pharmaceutical safety guideline.
All tobacco and nicotine delivery devices should be held to the same safety guideline. Exempting cigarettes, while holding alternative nicotine delivery devices to an impossibly stringent safety guideline, will not protect current American smokers. It will only protect Altria/Philip Morris cigarette sales and profits.
On behalf of the Tobacco Control Task Force of the American Association of Public Health Physicians, I therefore urge to consider the following:
1. Withdraw your proposal to ban electronic cigarettes.
2. Urge amendment of the proposed FDA/Tobacco bill to encourage the development and marketing of alternatives to cigarettes, under strict but fair FDA oversight, and with marketing restrictions in place to reduce the numbers of adolescents who initiate use of cigarettes and other nicotine delivery products.
The amendments we think will achieve these goals, and the results of our analyses and literature reviews, are posted on the tobacco issues page of our www.aaphp.org web site.
Joel L. Nitzkin, MD, MPH, DPA, FACPM
Chair, Tobacco Control Task Force
American Association of Public Health Physicians
c/o JLN, MD Associates LLC
jln@jln-md.com
office phone 504 899 7893
fax 504 899 7557
cell phone 504 606 7043
see www.aaphp.org, “tobacco issues”
Tags: alternatives to smoking, ecig, electric cigarette, electric cigarettes, electronic cigarette, electronic cigarettes, second hand smoke, second hand smoking, smokeless cigarette, smokeless cigarettes

March 30th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
I can only echo your concerns. The very thought that an electronic device with ingredients that have not shown any connection to cancer should be banned by a government agency is beyond my comprehension. That same agency allows a tobacco product that every reasonable person in this country knows is responsible for the deaths and serious illness of millions of Americans. The agency thinks it can manipulate the nicotine quantity in the tobacco cigarette to dissuade smokers, when history has shown the tobacco companies that lowering the nicotine increases sales. Perhaps the FDA understands this same lesson and they are willing to sacrifice American lives so they may increase sales and thus increase tax revenue. That is despicable!
April 16th, 2009 at 8:32 pm
Nice blog, Nice information, and most of all nice product. Thumns up!
P.S. when are you going to do those weekend 50 percent off deals again?
May 2nd, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Banning the electronic cigarettes would be an absolutely absurd move. I and my family have been using electronic cigarettes for the last 6 months and they definitely have made a huge difference in our quality of life. We have all cut back our consumption by about 50% and feel overall healthier. This is a safer alternative to smoking traditional cigarettes and I see no difference than those that use the patch or nicotine gums.
Please reconsider and realize that you would be doing more harm than good by banning the electronic cigarettes.
July 6th, 2009 at 8:32 pm
There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also.
August 5th, 2009 at 11:50 am
Oh, I’ve done the research. I’ve updated the post to include a hyperlink to the Wisconsin Law Review article I wrote on the subject.
September 29th, 2009 at 8:01 pm
If it will work I’m for it cause it can’t be any worse than cigarettes. personally I think that the tobbaco company aught to give them away to people that wont to quit. They have already made millions off of smokers and millions of americans have died from cigarette smoking. lets face it if the tobbaco company cared about the american people they would have never made a product that kills. It’s all about the mighty dollar that they are making off of us smokers. Gods word says, the love of money is evil !!
November 20th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Hi guys I have been looking for smokeless cigarettes trying to keep people around more healthier now my girlfriend is having a baby so need to get the air around them both clean so any suggestion on what smokeless cigarette to use
January 12th, 2010 at 3:34 pm
Please send an email to smokeanywhere@smoke51.com regarding this and they will be sure to cancel it for you thank you for you business sorry you could not get a hold of anyone on the phone we have just set up a call queued system so i am sure if you attempt to call now you will be able to get in contact with someone
February 2nd, 2010 at 12:32 pm
I’ve found that my esmoke cures my nicotine needs more than expected.
March 4th, 2010 at 2:51 pm
For cancellations and refunds please call 1-866-349-2161